1. Peter Zenger was a newspaper publisher in New York, who voiced opposition towards the policies of newly appointed colonial Governor William Crosby. As a result of these publications in his newspaper, Peter Zenger was arrested and charged with seditious libel.
2. The controversy over the charges was that Peter Zenger was wrongly convicted. To defend Zenger, Hamilton proved to the court that Zenger could not be convicted with libel because the offending stories about Cosby that Zenger published were all based on fact, they were not made up. In conclusion, Zenger was set free because his offending stories about Cosby were true and since they were true, Zenger couldn't be convicted of libel.
3. The significance of Zenger's trial was that Lawyers could now defend clients by proving that if a statement is true, than it's not libel. After the trial, Judges also saw Libel cases in a new way, leading to better outcomes for people convicted of libel.
4. The lasting signifcance of Zenger's trail was the further advancement of freedom of the press. Furthermore, newspapers were now able to publish offending articles and stories as long as they were true. This is all because Zenger's trial proved that if statements were true, persons could not be convicted of libel. Libel cases, now also had better outcomes for the defense.
No comments:
Post a Comment